Krasemann - Blog Post Layout
First Half:
Olivia
Wills + Sarah + Hurley
Amari
Second Half:
Tara
Thomas
Jess
Josh
Cam
Before break:
Olivia: two critiques of universal sympathy: sociopaths and closeted individuals, specifically LGBTQ+
Wills: The evolutionary purpose of human virtues and sympathy, how moral sentiments are a system of “carrots and sticks”
Sarah: Benevolent actions/virtues can be deceptively selfish and easily misguided
Hurley: Does the origin of virtue or reason undermine its truth or value?
Amari: Adjusting emotions seems to undermine Shiffrin’s thinker-based approach to free speech
After break:
Tara: Wealth and antitrust laws as they pertain to sympathy, why the wealthy maintain their wealth and how it threatens democracy.
Thomas: How to maximize sympathy (empathy) through relationships, whether society is mostly selfish or sympathetic.
Jess: How Smith’s concept of rank and wealth relates to privilege today. Also ties into the privilege of rank and sympathy.
Josh: Decency, psychological theory, and celebrity worship.
“It would be an exciting discussion to develop why certain groups of people have different standards of propriety and why they came to those definitions.”
Cam: Complications of love. How does love pertain to empathy? Rarity of love.
Other things to discuss:
Death
Distinction between sympathy and empathy
Politics - bipartisan division, polarization resulting from mutual sympathy
Class distinction - what about before there was appreciable wealth? Was ambition really a thing?
Comments